Thursday, June 30, 2011

Things and Stuff About Amazon and an Article About PKD's Writing


Gentle readers, as you no doubt have already heard, amazon canceled all of their associate accounts in California last night. So, I am switching over to Powell books, where I should have been in the first place. My feelings on the subject are well voiced by this dood.

So, let's do this. Go buy Umberto's book over there:



Pre-order your copy of The Exegesis over there:

The Exegesis of Philip K Dick

I just noticed there's a video for the book!



In case none of this interests you, check out this article examining PKD's prose style.

Check this out:

A long silence, then. Then, “Oof.” She leaped, galvanized as if lost to the shock of a formal experiment. His pale, dignified, unclothed possession: become a tall and very thin greenless nervous system of a frog; probed to life by outside means. Victim of a current not her own but not protested, in any way. Lucid and real, accepting. Ready this long time.

"Take a minute to read this passage closely. You may not have noticed, but Dick has just compared a naked woman in the throes of orgasm to an electrified frog. Yet the description is so out-of-nowhere unexpected and ambiguously communicated that the first time I read it I thought Dick was comparing a penis to a jolted frog leg (“become tall and thin…”). There’s also the weird, dehumanizing way that the woman here is labeled a “possession,” a description given some obvious counterweight—one can sense Dick hoping—by the word “dignified.” And the adjective “greenless” is stupefyingly strange in this instance (and would be in a lot of other instances)."

Did that guy just completely misread the excerpt he's analyzing? The woman is galvanized; the penis is like the frog of a nervous system. I'm not defending it, I'm just looking at the syntax! But I think I like point the guy's making, if I understand it correctly. The other cool thing, the guy quotes Lethem:

"What does it mean when a great writer like Philip K. Dick is considered to have an occasionally terrible prose style? Even so brilliant and well-regarded a defender of Dick’s novels as author Jonathan Lethem has referred, in a 2007 interview with the online journal Article for example, to Dick’s “howlingly bad” patches of prose."

That's my interview! Nice thing about the internet is sometimes you send something out through a tube, it comes back to you through another!

Up top that's a picture of the new Mariner Books editions of PKD's VALIS. Here's a forum where you can look at some of the others... I kinda like this one...

7 comments:

  1. These Mariner books look fantastic! They're definitely a step-up from the Vintage covers... I hope they print more though. I've only read about four PKD novels so far, and I'd love to get the rest through this publisher.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Mariner covers--based on these two--are bad. Someone with Photoshop slapping together dull typography with hacked out computer graphics. They look like what one would see on a budget line of books.

    Are they? (A budget line?)

    As for the Exegesis....hmmm. I might--might--buy it...just to have it on my bookshelf as part of my PKD library, as I did with Lawrence Sutin's previous EXCERPTS FROM THE EXEGESIS, but...is anyone actually interested in slogging through it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Robert Cook: I have read and re-read the selections, and will undoubtedly do the same with this new publication (though it will certainly take longer). It is tedious at times, and again, this one I'm sure will be more-so, but the "meat" of PKD's philosophical journey is a very real and important thing to me. So yes, someone is interested!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I noticed there are little variations in the title card areas of most, but not all, of the covers. Nice little touch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love these covers... the Vintage Covers are too busy and look like the decade they came from (the 90's) .. These covers are timeless to me and while they might not reflect on the story they have a very nice look and will most likely look great on a shelf.

    Here's a schedule of what they're publishing so far:

    10/18/11:

    VALIS
    A Scanner Darkly
    The Simulacra
    Lies, Inc.
    Now Wait for Last Year
    The Divine Invasion
    The Transmigration of Timothy Archer
    The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch

    11/08/11:

    The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick

    01/24/12:

    The Man in the High Castle
    The Penultimate Truth
    The Crack in Space

    04/17/12:
    Ubik
    Ubik: The Screenplay
    The Crack in Space

    05/15/12:
    The Man Who Japed
    Eye in the Sky
    The Zap Gun

    07/17/12:
    Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said
    The Cosmic Puppets
    Gather Yourselves Together (!!!!!!!!!)

    08/14/12:
    Solar Lottery
    We Can Build You
    The World Jones Made

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love these covers... the Vintage Covers are too busy and look like the decade they came from (the 90's) .. These covers are timeless to me and while they might not reflect on the story they have a very nice look and will most likely look great on a shelf.

    Here's a schedule of what they're publishing so far:

    10/18/11:

    VALIS
    A Scanner Darkly
    The Simulacra
    Lies, Inc.
    Now Wait for Last Year
    The Divine Invasion
    The Transmigration of Timothy Archer
    The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch

    11/08/11:

    The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick

    01/24/12:

    The Man in the High Castle
    The Penultimate Truth
    The Crack in Space

    04/17/12:
    Ubik
    Ubik: The Screenplay
    The Crack in Space

    05/15/12:
    The Man Who Japed
    Eye in the Sky
    The Zap Gun

    07/17/12:
    Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said
    The Cosmic Puppets
    Gather Yourselves Together (!!!!!!!!!)

    08/14/12:
    Solar Lottery
    We Can Build You
    The World Jones Made

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think these covers are uninspired and boring. It feels like a literary critic push to get the book down commercially, so that it will not get read.

    Bring back the illustrations. This new modernist trend feels droll and lifeless.

    ReplyDelete