data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f00b/4f00b7f48753082991bf818e792a592ec35c36d2" alt=""
This is an amazing collection of critical essays on PKD that I think is pretty hard to find. A friend found my copy at a library discard sale. The essays are pedantic as hell but they have a sing-song quality that's kind of nice. Peter Fitting in his essay "'Ubik': The Deconstruction of the Bourgeois SF" writes:
The traditional "representational novel" functions in this way as an ideological support for capitalism: it reinforces the a transcendental conception of reality which mystifies [poll: does he get the pun he's just made discussing Ubik?] the actual reality of the capitalist mode of production and the resultant repression and alienation.
The book even has charts:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74de7/74de74b03307253eaa6088e8c42641116e8c7cc6" alt=""
Here's the weird part - this edition was published in 1983 - check out the blurb on the back:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94b7d/94b7d1ad3079f1bbbaa55b8b434ec767817e4cc3" alt=""
"...has at last begun to receive the recognition he deserves..." ??
Here it is twenty-four years later and I still see that sentence in every PKD article I read... Something is out of joint; what could it possibly be?
1 comment:
The Guardian in the UK always has someone saying 'at last, Philip K Dick's writing receives the treatment it deserves' whenever a film based on one of his stories comes out. They did it with A Scanner Darkly and they also did it with Minority Report, amazingly. They've yet to do so with Next, though. Can't think why...
Post a Comment